RESUMO
Intracranial vertebral artery dissection (VAD) is the most common arterial dissection in intracranial arteries. Some types of VAD can heal spontaneously after reconstitution of the vessel lumen with excellent prognosis, whereas others can progress to stroke that needs treatment. Recently, endovascular treatment (EVT) has emerged and is suggested as a treatment option for VADs due to perceived low rates of procedure-related morbidity with good efficacy. In the last decade, we have accumulated our strategies to treat those VADs. Here, we try to share our experiences about VADs, including indications and methods of treatment of VADs using EVT. We perform EVT for ruptured VADs presenting with SAH and some of unruptured VADs such as VAD with recurrent or progressive ischemia, dissecting aneurysm larger than 7 mm or with mass effect, early ugly change of VADs in shape and size during follow-up period, involving the basilar artery (BA) and bilateral VADs. We present how we have done in our real practice for the last decade for treating VADs by EVT rather than reviewing and organizing so-far-published literature. We tended to occlude the rupture point by vertebral artery (VA) occlusion in non-dominant VA or stent-assisted coiling in dominant VA for ruptured VADs. We tended to reconstruct original hemodynamics using various stents for unruptured VADs. To decide what to treat and how to treat are very complicated for VADs. However, we believe that EVT is the current mainstay for treating VADs. Each technique of EVT should be determined on a case-by-case basis at the discretion of endovascular neurosurgeons and/or interventional neuroradiologists according to presenting symptoms, hemodynamic status, including sufficiency of the collateral supply and anatomic features of the vertebrobasilar artery as well as the posterior inferior cerebellar artery, anterior spinal artery, and medullary perforators.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Differentiation between pseudo-occlusion and true occlusion of internal carotid artery (ICA) is important in treatment planning for acute ischemic stroke patients. We compared the findings of multiphasic computed tomography angiography between cervical ICA pseudo-occlusion and true occlusion at the cervical ICA in patients with anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke to determine their diagnostic value. METHODS: Thirty patients with nonvisualization of the proximal ICA were included. Diagnosis of pseudo- or true occlusion of the ICA was made based on digital subtraction angiography. Diagnostic performances of multiphasic computed tomography angiography findings-(1) a flame-shaped stump and (2) delayed contrast filling at the cervical ICA- were evaluated and compared. The Fisher exact test, χ2 test, or Wilcoxon rank-sum test and McNemar test were used in the data analysis. RESULTS: Twelve patients had true proximal ICA occlusion and 18 had pseudo-occlusion. Delayed contrast filling at the cervical ICA on multiphasic computed tomography angiography was found in all patients with pseudo-occlusion of the ICA, while 1 case of true occlusion showed delayed contrast filling (P<0.001). The presence of a flame-shaped stump was not significantly different between the pseudo- and true occlusion groups. The sensitivity of delayed contrast filling (0.94 [95% CI, 0.73-1]) was significantly higher than that of flame-shaped stump (0.75 [95% CI, 0.36-0.83]). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that the delayed filling sign on multiphasic computed tomography angiography could be a useful and readily available finding for differentiating proximal ICA pseudo-occlusion from true occlusion.
